Natural law theory:
	an action is morally right if it promotes the satisfaction of a natural inclination.  it is wrong if it hinders natural inclinations.
	the four basic natural inclinations:
		life
		procreation
		sociality
		knowledge

	conflicts:
		ex. lying to save a life

	principle of forfeiture (only applies to life)
		- you forfeit your own life if you try to take the life of another
		ex. self defense

	principle of double effect
		- if a conflict occurs, it is right to do the action if these three conditions are satisfied:
			you intend only the good action
			the good result is not caused by the bad result
			the good result outweighs the bad result

	mill's delimma
		no god?
		what defines natural?
		anything animals do is natural
		are humans animals and therefore anything we do is natural?


utilitarianism:
	an action is right if it [is expected to] produce[s] more happiness than any other [kind of] action
	an action is wrong if it doesn't maximize happiness AND deserves a reprimand
	hedons to consider for those affected:
		pleasure/absence of pain
		sense of security
		sense of dignity
		harmonious development
		individuality
		concern for others


Kant's deontology:
	do not treat anyone as a mere means or in a way that no rational person would consent to being treated
	what does rational consent mean?
	rational -> infinite value, value in the world comes from rational people, end in and of themselves
	an action is right if the guiding rule can be willed as a universal law
		everyone could follow it
		no rational person would want an exception



virtue ethics:
	an action is right if a virtuous person would do it
	look at virtues on each side and reasons for choice
	right action, method, and reasons